Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBDS vs SMH
NBDS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts NBDS vs SMH
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$34.51
Change+$0.48 (+1.41%)
Volume$574
Net Assets25.17M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$290.31
Change-$1.40 (-0.48%)
Volume$5.52M
Net Assets27.34B
NBDS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBDS vs. SMH commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBDS is a StrongBuy and SMH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.3B vs. NBDS (25.2M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than NBDS: SMH (19.879) vs NBDS (15.943). NBDS was incepted earlier than SMH: NBDS (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than NBDS (0.55). NBDS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| NBDS | SMH | NBDS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 15.943 | 19.879 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 25.2M | 27.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.35 | 157% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 15.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NBDS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 18 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBDS has been closely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBDS jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | +1.39% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| NVMI - NBDS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| HOOD - NBDS | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AVGO - NBDS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| HUBS - NBDS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||