Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBDS vs SMH
NBDS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts NBDS vs SMH
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$35.54
Change-$0.35 (-0.98%)
Volume$2.59K
Net Assets27.69M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$321.87
Change+$0.81 (+0.25%)
Volume$15.91K
Net Assets30.58B
NBDS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBDS vs. SMH commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBDS is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 30.6B vs. NBDS (27.7M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than NBDS: SMH (32.576) vs NBDS (19.414). NBDS was incepted earlier than SMH: NBDS (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than NBDS (0.55). NBDS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| NBDS | SMH | NBDS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.414 | 32.576 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 27.7M | 30.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.35 | 157% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 15.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NBDS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBDS and AMZN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBDS and AMZN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| AMZN - NBDS | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| HUBS - NBDS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| LLY - NBDS | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.67% | ||
| MRNA - NBDS | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.91% | ||
| PCOR - NBDS | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
More | ||||