NB
Price
$2.41
Change
+$0.07 (+2.99%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
95.56M
NILIF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
64.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NB vs NILIF

Header iconNB vs NILIF Comparison
Open Charts NB vs NILIFBanner chart's image
NioCorp Developments
Price$2.41
Change+$0.07 (+2.99%)
Volume$309.43K
Capitalization95.56M
Surge Battery Metals
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35.59K
Capitalization64.2M
NB vs NILIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NB vs. NILIF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NB is a Hold and NILIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NB: $2.41 vs. NILIF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: NB and NILIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NB: 38% vs. NILIF: 37%
Market capitalization -- NB: $95.56M vs. NILIF: $64.2M
NB [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $95.56M. NILIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $64.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNILIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NILIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NB and NILIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NILIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NILIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NB is a better buy in the short-term than NILIF.

Price Growth

NB (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -12.04% price change this week, while NILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NB($95.6M) has a higher market cap than NILIF($64.2M). NB YTD gains are higher at: 55.484 vs. NILIF (-29.625). NILIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.19M vs. NB (-35.81M). NILIF has more cash in the bank: 2.12M vs. NB (634K). NILIF has less debt than NB: NILIF (18.4K) vs NB (5.74M). NB (0) and NILIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NBNILIFNB / NILIF
Capitalization95.6M64.2M149%
EBITDA-35.81M-3.19M1,124%
Gain YTD55.484-29.625-187%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash634K2.12M30%
Total Debt5.74M18.4K31,174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NB vs NILIF: Fundamental Ratings
NB
NILIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4386
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NILIF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NB (72). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as NB (100). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as NB (100). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

NB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NILIF (86). This means that NB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (100). This means that NB’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBNILIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIFFF1.850.10
+5.82%
Li-Ft Power Ltd.
BRVO0.05N/A
+5.36%
Bravo Multinational Incorporated
FRZCF1.75N/A
N/A
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
BSSC240.00N/A
N/A
Bank of Southside (The) (Carson, VA)
KHOLY19.93-0.51
-2.50%
Koc Holdings A.S.

NB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NB and UAMY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NB and UAMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NB
1D Price
Change %
NB100%
+2.99%
UAMY - NB
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
MP - NB
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
WRN - NB
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
NILIF - NB
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
IONR - NB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More

NILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NILIF has been loosely correlated with LYSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NILIF jumps, then LYSCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NILIF
1D Price
Change %
NILIF100%
-2.42%
LYSCF - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
LYSDY - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
PILBF - NILIF
31%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
PMETF - NILIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
BDNNY - NILIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More