NAUH
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.25M
TRU
Price
$85.19
Change
+$0.88 (+1.04%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.6B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAUH vs TRU

Header iconNAUH vs TRU Comparison
Open Charts NAUH vs TRUBanner chart's image
National American University Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$617
Capitalization1.25M
TransUnion
Price$85.19
Change+$0.88 (+1.04%)
Volume$2.27M
Capitalization16.6B
NAUH vs TRU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAUH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAUH vs. TRU commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAUH is a Buy and TRU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NAUH: $0.05 vs. TRU: $85.19)
Brand notoriety: NAUH and TRU are both not notable
NAUH represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while TRU is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAUH: 5% vs. TRU: 79%
Market capitalization -- NAUH: $1.25M vs. TRU: $16.6B
NAUH [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $1.25M. TRU’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $16.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAUH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NAUH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAUH is a better buy in the long-term than TRU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAUH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAUH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAUH is a better buy in the short-term than TRU.

Price Growth

NAUH (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRU (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -5.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRU is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.49% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.63% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRU($16.6B) has a higher market cap than NAUH($1.25M). TRU has higher P/E ratio than NAUH: TRU (42.81) vs NAUH (5.07). NAUH YTD gains are higher at: 141.429 vs. TRU (-7.749). TRU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. NAUH (945K). TRU has more cash in the bank: 690M vs. NAUH (121K). NAUH has less debt than TRU: NAUH (3.18M) vs TRU (5.2B). TRU has higher revenues than NAUH: TRU (4.36B) vs NAUH (9.47M).
NAUHTRUNAUH / TRU
Capitalization1.25M16.6B0%
EBITDA945K1.34B0%
Gain YTD141.429-7.749-1,825%
P/E Ratio5.0742.8112%
Revenue9.47M4.36B0%
Total Cash121K690M0%
Total Debt3.18M5.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAUH vs TRU: Fundamental Ratings
NAUH
TRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
507
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
10074
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6295
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAUH's Valuation (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TRU (77) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NAUH’s stock grew similarly to TRU’s over the last 12 months.

TRU's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NAUH (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TRU’s stock grew similarly to NAUH’s over the last 12 months.

TRU's SMR Rating (74) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NAUH (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TRU’s stock grew similarly to NAUH’s over the last 12 months.

NAUH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TRU (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NAUH’s stock grew similarly to TRU’s over the last 12 months.

NAUH's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRU (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NAUH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAUHTRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
55%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAUH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NKTX2.040.04
+2.00%
Nkarta
CNTA23.260.25
+1.09%
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
CG63.990.34
+0.53%
Carlyle Group (The)
HBNB2.990.01
+0.34%
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
WTO1.06-0.03
-2.75%
UTime Limited

NAUH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUH and SCTBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUH and SCTBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUH
1D Price
Change %
NAUH100%
N/A
SCTBF - NAUH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRU - NAUH
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
NL - NAUH
14%
Poorly correlated
+4.27%
UTI - NAUH
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
MG - NAUH
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More

TRU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRU has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRU jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRU
1D Price
Change %
TRU100%
+1.04%
MCO - TRU
71%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
MORN - TRU
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
EFX - TRU
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
NDAQ - TRU
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
SPGI - TRU
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More