NAUFF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.8M
STBMF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
93.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAUFF vs STBMF

Header iconNAUFF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts NAUFF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Nevgold
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.06K
Capitalization20.8M
St. Barbara
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization93.29M
NAUFF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAUFF vs. STBMF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAUFF is a Hold and STBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NAUFF: $0.25 vs. STBMF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: NAUFF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAUFF: 55% vs. STBMF: 70%
Market capitalization -- NAUFF: $20.8M vs. STBMF: $93.29M
NAUFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.8M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $93.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAUFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAUFF is a better buy in the long-term than STBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAUFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAUFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than NAUFF.

Price Growth

NAUFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.69% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($93.3M) has a higher market cap than NAUFF($20.8M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 101.149 vs. NAUFF (67.061). NAUFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. STBMF (-28.54M). STBMF has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. NAUFF (1.07M). NAUFF has less debt than STBMF: NAUFF (259K) vs STBMF (12.9M). STBMF has higher revenues than NAUFF: STBMF (110M) vs NAUFF (0).
NAUFFSTBMFNAUFF / STBMF
Capitalization20.8M93.3M22%
EBITDA-2.57M-28.54M9%
Gain YTD67.061101.14966%
P/E Ratio0.41N/A-
Revenue0110M-
Total Cash1.07M294M0%
Total Debt259K12.9M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAUFF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
NAUFF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAUFF (44). This means that STBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STBMF (100). This means that NAUFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUFF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (93). This means that NAUFF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUFF (41). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to NAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUFF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (97). This means that NAUFF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAUFFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYRZX14.240.13
+0.92%
Lyrical International Value Equity C
PWCIX85.120.49
+0.58%
Principal Capital Appreciation Inst
WFILX54.550.29
+0.53%
Allspring Index A
DREYX41.320.12
+0.29%
Davis Real Estate Y
GLDCX27.25-1.14
-4.02%
Gabelli Gold C

NAUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUFF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUFF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUFF
1D Price
Change %
NAUFF100%
-2.26%
NSUPF - NAUFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
BYAGF - NAUFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
SSVFF - NAUFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
STRRF - NAUFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STPGF - NAUFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STBMF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STBMF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
PREIF - STBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
STPGF - STBMF
12%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
NAUFF - STBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More