NAUBF
Price
$28.50
Change
+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
87.8B
RBSPF
Price
$6.94
Change
+$0.14 (+2.06%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
54.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAUBF vs RBSPF

Header iconNAUBF vs RBSPF Comparison
Open Charts NAUBF vs RBSPFBanner chart's image
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$28.50
Change+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Volume$535
Capitalization87.8B
NatWest Group
Price$6.94
Change+$0.14 (+2.06%)
Volume$23.77K
Capitalization54.58B
NAUBF vs RBSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAUBF vs. RBSPF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAUBF is a Hold and RBSPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NAUBF: $28.50 vs. RBSPF: $6.94)
Brand notoriety: NAUBF and RBSPF are both not notable
NAUBF represents the Major Banks, while RBSPF is part of the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAUBF: 88% vs. RBSPF: 185%
Market capitalization -- NAUBF: $87.8B vs. RBSPF: $54.58B
NAUBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $87.8B. RBSPF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $54.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAUBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSPF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBSPF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBSPF is a better buy in the long-term than NAUBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAUBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAUBF is a better buy in the short-term than RBSPF.

Price Growth

NAUBF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RBSPF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAUBF($87.8B) has a higher market cap than RBSPF($54.6B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than RBSPF: NAUBF (19.34) vs RBSPF (8.79). RBSPF YTD gains are higher at: 44.635 vs. NAUBF (23.805). RBSPF has less debt than NAUBF: RBSPF (70B) vs NAUBF (212B). NAUBF has higher revenues than RBSPF: NAUBF (20.7B) vs RBSPF (15.5B).
NAUBFRBSPFNAUBF / RBSPF
Capitalization87.8B54.6B161%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.80544.63553%
P/E Ratio19.348.79220%
Revenue20.7B15.5B134%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt212B70B303%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAUBF vs RBSPF: Fundamental Ratings
NAUBF
RBSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
979
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
247
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBSPF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAUBF (80). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (24). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as RBSPF (5). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RBSPF (51). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (37). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAUBFRBSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLFS24.700.52
+2.15%
BioLife Solutions
WEX160.562.50
+1.58%
WEX
SNPS487.760.56
+0.11%
Synopsys
OKUR2.51-0.03
-1.18%
OnKure Therapeutics Inc
HRZN6.14-0.08
-1.29%
Horizon Technology Finance Corp

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and BBVXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and BBVXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
BBVXF - NAUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RBSPF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
INGVF - NAUBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MBFJF - NAUBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
SCBFF - NAUBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
More

RBSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSPF and MBFJF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSPF and MBFJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSPF
1D Price
Change %
RBSPF100%
+2.02%
MBFJF - RBSPF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
NABZY - RBSPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
NAUBF - RBSPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDCBY - RBSPF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
SCBFF - RBSPF
-9%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
More