NATL vs NCCGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATL is a Hold and NCCGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NATL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNCCGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NATL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NCCGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NATL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NATL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NATL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.85% price change this week, while NCCGF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
NATL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| NATL | NCCGF | NATL / NCCGF | |
| Capitalization | 1.41B | 387M | 363% |
| EBITDA | 451M | 55.7M | 810% |
| Gain YTD | 35.858 | 81.818 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.80 | - |
| Revenue | 4.19B | 341M | 1,229% |
| Total Cash | 339M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.12B | N/A | - |
NATL | NCCGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NCCGF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATL (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that NCCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATL’s over the last 12 months.
NATL's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCCGF (100) in the null industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCCGF’s over the last 12 months.
NCCGF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as NATL (92) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that NCCGF’s stock grew similarly to NATL’s over the last 12 months.
NCCGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NATL (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that NCCGF’s stock grew similarly to NATL’s over the last 12 months.
NCCGF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NATL (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that NCCGF’s stock grew similarly to NATL’s over the last 12 months.
| NATL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
NATL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATL has been loosely correlated with NCCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATL jumps, then NCCGF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NATL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATL | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| NCCGF - NATL | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AGYS - NATL | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| SPSC - NATL | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| PAR - NATL | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| EEFT - NATL | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
NCCGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCCGF has been closely correlated with ETWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCCGF jumps, then ETWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCCGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCCGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ETWO - NCCGF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| NATL - NCCGF | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| SNTMF - NCCGF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMVWF - NCCGF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSQH - NCCGF | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||