NATH
Price
$101.05
Change
-$0.14 (-0.14%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
414.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WEN
Price
$8.07
Change
+$0.29 (+3.73%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.48B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs WEN

Header iconNATH vs WEN Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs WENBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$101.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.14%)
Volume$400
Capitalization414.31M
Wendy's
Price$8.07
Change+$0.29 (+3.73%)
Volume$14.66K
Capitalization1.48B
NATH vs WEN Comparison Chart in %
NATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. WEN commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Buy and WEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (NATH: $101.19 vs. WEN: $7.78)
Brand notoriety: NATH and WEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 73% vs. WEN: 124%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $414.31M vs. WEN: $1.48B
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $414.31M. WEN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $227.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than WEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than WEN.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while WEN (@Restaurants) price change was -2.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

WEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.67% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEN($1.48B) has a higher market cap than NATH($414M). NATH has higher P/E ratio than WEN: NATH (18.23) vs WEN (8.28). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 8.144 vs. WEN (-6.603). WEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 552M vs. NATH (35.3M). WEN has more cash in the bank: 291M vs. NATH (32.2M). NATH has less debt than WEN: NATH (53.9M) vs WEN (4.12B). WEN has higher revenues than NATH: WEN (2.21B) vs NATH (155M).
NATHWENNATH / WEN
Capitalization414M1.48B28%
EBITDA35.3M552M6%
Gain YTD8.144-6.603-123%
P/E Ratio18.238.28220%
Revenue155M2.21B7%
Total Cash32.2M291M11%
Total Debt53.9M4.12B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs WEN: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
WEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8061
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
3913
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5182
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1823

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WEN's Valuation (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (44). This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for WEN (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than WEN’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's SMR Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (39). This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (82). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WEN (94). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHWEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWEAX18.680.47
+2.58%
PACE International Em Mkts Eq A
SGPSX87.69-0.28
-0.32%
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Svc
JATTX26.55-0.12
-0.45%
Janus Henderson Triton T
RYSAX553.51-11.41
-2.02%
Rydex Electronics H
AGRCX124.81-2.67
-2.09%
AB Growth C

WEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEN
1D Price
Change %
WEN100%
+1.17%
DIN - WEN
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
RICK - WEN
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
FRSH - WEN
44%
Loosely correlated
-10.60%
JACK - WEN
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
SBUX - WEN
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More