NATH
Price
$93.92
Change
+$3.59 (+3.97%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
384.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WEN
Price
$8.56
Change
+$0.07 (+0.82%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.57B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs WEN

Header iconNATH vs WEN Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs WENBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$93.92
Change+$3.59 (+3.97%)
Volume$39.57K
Capitalization384.09M
Wendy's
Price$8.56
Change+$0.07 (+0.82%)
Volume$7.23M
Capitalization1.57B
NATH vs WEN Comparison Chart in %
NATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. WEN commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a StrongBuy and WEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $89.98 vs. WEN: $8.49)
Brand notoriety: NATH and WEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 37% vs. WEN: 133%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $384.09M vs. WEN: $1.63B
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $384.09M. WEN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWEN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than WEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WEN is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.06% price change this week, while WEN (@Restaurants) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

WEN is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.04% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEN($1.57B) has a higher market cap than NATH($384M). NATH has higher P/E ratio than WEN: NATH (16.92) vs WEN (8.76). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 16.107 vs. WEN (-45.685). WEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 555M vs. NATH (37M). WEN has more cash in the bank: 281M vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than WEN: NATH (54.9M) vs WEN (4.09B). WEN has higher revenues than NATH: WEN (2.23B) vs NATH (150M).
NATHWENNATH / WEN
Capitalization384M1.57B25%
EBITDA37M555M7%
Gain YTD16.107-45.685-35%
P/E Ratio16.928.76193%
Revenue150M2.23B7%
Total Cash26.9M281M10%
Total Debt54.9M4.09B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs WEN: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
WEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
4014
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6382
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WEN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATH (55). This means that WEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for WEN (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than WEN’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's SMR Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (82). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WEN (94). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHWEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSOAX37.79N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class A
BEOLF2.65N/A
N/A
BEYOND OIL LTD.
JCNRX27.67N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian R
FDCPX136.89N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Tech Hardware
HKRHF0.09N/A
N/A
HONG KONG RESOURCES HOLDINGS CO LTD

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with BROS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then BROS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-1.89%
BROS - NATH
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
WEN - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
RICK - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
TXRH - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
LOCO - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

WEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEN
1D Price
Change %
WEN100%
+3.16%
DIN - WEN
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.32%
FWRG - WEN
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
FRSH - WEN
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.12%
JACK - WEN
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
QSR - WEN
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More