NATH
Price
$94.28
Change
+$0.52 (+0.55%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
385.56M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBUX
Price
$85.08
Change
+$0.51 (+0.60%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
96.74B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs SBUX

Header iconNATH vs SBUX Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs SBUXBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$94.28
Change+$0.52 (+0.55%)
Volume$40.14K
Capitalization385.56M
Starbucks
Price$85.08
Change+$0.51 (+0.60%)
Volume$5.05M
Capitalization96.74B
NATH vs SBUX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. SBUX commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a StrongBuy and SBUX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $94.28 vs. SBUX: $85.08)
Brand notoriety: NATH: Not notable vs. SBUX: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 91% vs. SBUX: 51%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $385.56M vs. SBUX: $96.74B
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $385.56M. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $96.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $221.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than SBUX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than SBUX.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($96.7B) has a higher market cap than NATH($386M). SBUX has higher P/E ratio than NATH: SBUX (52.20) vs NATH (16.99). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 21.655 vs. SBUX (-4.973). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.82B vs. NATH (35.3M). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 3.47B vs. NATH (32.2M). NATH has less debt than SBUX: NATH (53.9M) vs SBUX (26.6B). SBUX has higher revenues than NATH: SBUX (37.2B) vs NATH (155M).
NATHSBUXNATH / SBUX
Capitalization386M96.7B0%
EBITDA35.3M4.82B1%
Gain YTD21.655-4.973-435%
P/E Ratio16.9952.2033%
Revenue155M37.2B0%
Total Cash32.2M3.47B1%
Total Debt53.9M26.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
626
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
4010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBUX's Valuation (32) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (56). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBUX (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (59). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (32). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBUX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HQIAX20.520.03
+0.15%
Hartford Equity Income A
PMARX13.020.01
+0.08%
Victory Pioneer Equ Premium Income A
PTRRF0.03N/A
N/A
Pointerra Ltd.
ARAQX10.42N/A
N/A
Aristotle Value Eq A
WFINX59.39-0.02
-0.03%
Allspring Index C

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with BROS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then BROS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+0.55%
BROS - NATH
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
WEN - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
RICK - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
DPZ - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
SBUX - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
+0.60%
FRSH - SBUX
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
SHAK - SBUX
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CAKE - SBUX
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
YUM - SBUX
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
BROS - SBUX
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More