NATH
Price
$110.47
Change
+$4.08 (+3.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
451.77M
PZZA
Price
$48.69
Change
+$0.16 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs PZZA

Header iconNATH vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs PZZABanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$110.47
Change+$4.08 (+3.83%)
Volume$100.27K
Capitalization451.77M
Papa John's International
Price$48.69
Change+$0.16 (+0.33%)
Volume$1.52M
Capitalization1.59B
NATH vs PZZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. PZZA commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Buy and PZZA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $110.47 vs. PZZA: $48.69)
Brand notoriety: NATH and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 232% vs. PZZA: 126%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $451.77M vs. PZZA: $1.59B
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $451.77M. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than PZZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than PZZA.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was -1.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZZA($1.59B) has a higher market cap than NATH($452M). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than NATH: PZZA (20.56) vs NATH (18.82). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 41.892 vs. PZZA (21.389). PZZA has more cash in the bank: 44M vs. NATH (7.71M). NATH has less debt than PZZA: NATH (56.8M) vs PZZA (984M).
NATHPZZANATH / PZZA
Capitalization452M1.59B28%
EBITDAN/A217M-
Gain YTD41.89221.389196%
P/E Ratio18.8220.5692%
RevenueN/A2.06B-
Total Cash7.71M44M18%
Total Debt56.8M984M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
417
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2354
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PZZA's Valuation (16) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATH (52). This means that PZZA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZZA (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATH (41). This means that PZZA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (42). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (54). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWACX23.270.14
+0.61%
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy C
MRLTX18.760.11
+0.59%
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth N
SFPIX12.420.05
+0.40%
Saratoga Financial Services I
JDVZX16.490.06
+0.37%
JPMorgan Diversified R6
FCDAX35.550.01
+0.03%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp A

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+3.84%
LOCO - NATH
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
PZZA - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PBPB - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
RICK - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CNNE - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
+0.33%
DIN - PZZA
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
WEN - PZZA
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
QSR - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
PBPB - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
PTLO - PZZA
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More