NATH
Price
$108.70
Change
+$1.90 (+1.78%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
444.53M
PBPB
Price
$10.90
Change
+$0.20 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
328.88M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs PBPB

Header iconNATH vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs PBPBBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$108.70
Change+$1.90 (+1.78%)
Volume$150.42K
Capitalization444.53M
Potbelly
Price$10.90
Change+$0.20 (+1.87%)
Volume$129.28K
Capitalization328.88M
NATH vs PBPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. PBPB commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a StrongBuy and PBPB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $104.00 vs. PBPB: $10.60)
Brand notoriety: NATH and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 215% vs. PBPB: 53%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $444.53M vs. PBPB: $328.88M
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $444.53M. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $328.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than PBPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was +5.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBPB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATH($445M) has a higher market cap than PBPB($329M). NATH has higher P/E ratio than PBPB: NATH (18.74) vs PBPB (7.79). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 32.972 vs. PBPB (12.527). NATH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.2M vs. PBPB (21.3M). NATH has more cash in the bank: 23.7M vs. PBPB (11.7M). NATH has less debt than PBPB: NATH (56.8M) vs PBPB (155M). PBPB has higher revenues than NATH: PBPB (463M) vs NATH (146M).
NATHPBPBNATH / PBPB
Capitalization445M329M135%
EBITDA38.2M21.3M179%
Gain YTD32.97212.527263%
P/E Ratio18.747.79241%
Revenue146M463M32%
Total Cash23.7M11.7M203%
Total Debt56.8M155M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1441
SMR RATING
1..100
4113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBPB (87). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (41). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's SMR Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (41). This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (44). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with PZZA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then PZZA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-0.10%
PZZA - NATH
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
LOCO - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
PBPB - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
TXRH - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
CNNE - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with RRGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then RRGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
+0.47%
RRGB - PBPB
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIN - PBPB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
PZZA - PBPB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
RICK - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
BJRI - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More