NAT
Price
$2.84
Change
+$0.04 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
592.9M
20 days until earnings call
TEN
Price
$19.93
Change
+$0.16 (+0.81%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
595.62M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAT vs TEN

Header iconNAT vs TEN Comparison
Open Charts NAT vs TENBanner chart's image
Nordic American Tanker
Price$2.84
Change+$0.04 (+1.43%)
Volume$14.85K
Capitalization592.9M
Tsakos Energy Navigation
Price$19.93
Change+$0.16 (+0.81%)
Volume$8.97K
Capitalization595.62M
NAT vs TEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAT vs. TEN commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAT is a StrongBuy and TEN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (NAT: $2.80 vs. TEN: $19.77)
Brand notoriety: NAT: Notable vs. TEN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAT: 103% vs. TEN: 49%
Market capitalization -- NAT: $592.9M vs. TEN: $595.62M
NAT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $592.9M. TEN’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $595.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $103.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NAT and TEN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAT is a better buy in the short-term than TEN.

Price Growth

NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while TEN (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAT is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

TEN is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.96% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEN($596M) and NAT($593M) have the same market capitalization . NAT has higher P/E ratio than TEN: NAT (16.47) vs TEN (4.42). NAT (17.729) and TEN (17.407) have similar YTD gains . NAT has less debt than TEN: NAT (270M) vs TEN (1.71B).
NATTENNAT / TEN
Capitalization593M596M99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.72917.407102%
P/E Ratio16.474.42372%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A350M-
Total Debt270M1.71B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT vs TEN: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
TEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
6270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1764
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TEN's Valuation (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as NAT (14) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (100) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's SMR Rating (62) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (48) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEN (64) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATTEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMCJX8.980.01
+0.11%
Miller Income A
PPYPX8.98N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE International I-2
GUXPX5.65N/A
N/A
Gabelli Utilities C
HUMDX15.74-0.07
-0.44%
Huber Mid Cap Value Inv
ISTNX86.88-0.59
-0.67%
Macquarie Science and Technology R6

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
-2.44%
DHT - NAT
82%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
FRO - NAT
80%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
TEN - NAT
78%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
INSW - NAT
78%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
TNK - NAT
77%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
More

TEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEN has been closely correlated with INSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEN jumps, then INSW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEN
1D Price
Change %
TEN100%
-2.47%
INSW - TEN
84%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
TNK - TEN
84%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
FRO - TEN
81%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
DHT - TEN
80%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
NAT - TEN
78%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
More