NAT
Price
$3.20
Change
-$0.01 (-0.31%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
677.6M
60 days until earnings call
TEN
Price
$22.84
Change
-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
688.11M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAT vs TEN

Header iconNAT vs TEN Comparison
Open Charts NAT vs TENBanner chart's image
Nordic American Tanker
Price$3.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.31%)
Volume$2.07M
Capitalization677.6M
Tsakos Energy Navigation
Price$22.84
Change-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Volume$215.89K
Capitalization688.11M
NAT vs TEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAT vs. TEN commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAT is a StrongBuy and TEN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NAT: $3.20 vs. TEN: $22.84)
Brand notoriety: NAT: Notable vs. TEN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAT: 104% vs. TEN: 59%
Market capitalization -- NAT: $677.6M vs. TEN: $688.11M
NAT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $677.6M. TEN’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $688.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $108.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TEN is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NAT and TEN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while TEN (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

TEN is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.82% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEN($688M) and NAT($678M) have the same market capitalization . NAT has higher P/E ratio than TEN: NAT (45.71) vs TEN (5.11). NAT YTD gains are higher at: 38.791 vs. TEN (35.639). NAT has less debt than TEN: NAT (340M) vs TEN (1.71B).
NATTENNAT / TEN
Capitalization678M688M99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.79135.639109%
P/E Ratio45.715.11895%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A350M-
Total Debt340M1.71B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT vs TEN: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
TEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7370
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8843
SMR RATING
1..100
8971
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
349
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TEN's Valuation (10) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as NAT (24) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (88) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TEN's SMR Rating (71) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as NAT (89) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (45) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEN (49) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATTEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FERAX12.700.10
+0.79%
First Eagle Global Real Assets A
AEIMX9.020.07
+0.78%
American Century Equity Income G
DRDCX25.840.15
+0.58%
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
IJMAX13.29N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value A
FMPOX30.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value I

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
-0.31%
DHT - NAT
82%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
FRO - NAT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
INSW - NAT
78%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
TNK - NAT
78%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
TEN - NAT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
More

TEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEN has been closely correlated with INSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEN jumps, then INSW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEN
1D Price
Change %
TEN100%
-0.39%
INSW - TEN
86%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
TNK - TEN
84%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
FRO - TEN
82%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
DHT - TEN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
NAT - TEN
77%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More