NAT
Price
$2.71
Change
+$0.03 (+1.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
573.84M
57 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$8.90
Change
+$0.03 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAT vs SFL

Header iconNAT vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts NAT vs SFLBanner chart's image
Nordic American Tanker
Price$2.71
Change+$0.03 (+1.12%)
Volume$1M
Capitalization573.84M
SFL
Price$8.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
Volume$388.15K
Capitalization1.19B
NAT vs SFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAT vs. SFL commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAT is a Hold and SFL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NAT: $2.71 vs. SFL: $8.90)
Brand notoriety: NAT: Notable vs. SFL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAT: 40% vs. SFL: 35%
Market capitalization -- NAT: $573.84M vs. SFL: $1.19B
NAT [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $573.84M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NAT and SFL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the short-term than NAT.

Price Growth

NAT (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAT is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+2.57% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.19B) has a higher market cap than NAT($574M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than NAT: SFL (21.71) vs NAT (15.94). NAT YTD gains are higher at: 13.944 vs. SFL (-7.259). NAT has less debt than SFL: NAT (270M) vs SFL (2.88B).
NATSFLNAT / SFL
Capitalization574M1.19B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.944-7.259-192%
P/E Ratio15.9421.7173%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt270M2.88B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
6161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2616
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAT's Valuation (19) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (19). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (100). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's SMR Rating (61) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (61). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (54). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (26). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBIRX56.240.59
+1.06%
Morgan Stanley Insight IR
CSXRX54.080.46
+0.86%
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx R6
TRGAX22.440.14
+0.63%
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials I
HRCVX21.490.12
+0.56%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income A
RYMVX77.120.39
+0.51%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value A

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
+1.12%
ECO - NAT
74%
Closely correlated
+4.70%
ASC - NAT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
HAFN - NAT
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
SFL - NAT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
GNK - NAT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
+0.34%
ECO - SFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
GNK - SFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
ASC - SFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
DAC - SFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
HAFN - SFL
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
More