NASB vs SSB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NASB is a Hold and SSB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NASB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NASB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NASB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
NASB is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
SSB is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.07% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| NASB | SSB | NASB / SSB | |
| Capitalization | 216M | 6.48B | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.347 | 0.342 | -102% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.51 | 12.88 | 58% |
| Revenue | 124M | 1.7B | 7% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 515M | - |
| Total Debt | 628M | 482M | 130% |
NASB | SSB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NASB's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSB (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NASB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSB’s over the last 12 months.
SSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NASB (95) in the null industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NASB’s over the last 12 months.
SSB's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NASB (40) in the null industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.
SSB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NASB (53) in the null industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.
NASB's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SSB (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NASB’s stock grew similarly to SSB’s over the last 12 months.
| SSB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
NASB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NASB and SSB have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NASB and SSB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NASB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NASB | 100% | N/A | ||
| SSB - NASB | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| FHB - NASB | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.90% | ||
| OZK - NASB | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.95% | ||
| FFIC - NASB | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.08% | ||
| ORRF - NASB | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
More | ||||
SSB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SSB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSB | 100% | -2.01% | ||
| UBSI - SSB | 90% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| UCB - SSB | 89% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| FFIN - SSB | 89% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| FNB - SSB | 88% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| IBOC - SSB | 88% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||