NAPRF
Price
$70.15
Change
-$0.20 (-0.28%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
58.03B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TCEHY
Price
$83.34
Change
-$0.66 (-0.79%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
764.72B
131 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAPRF vs TCEHY

Header iconNAPRF vs TCEHY Comparison
Open Charts NAPRF vs TCEHYBanner chart's image
Naspers
Price$70.15
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
Volume$26
Capitalization58.03B
Tencent Holding
Price$83.34
Change-$0.66 (-0.79%)
Volume$4.08M
Capitalization764.72B
NAPRF vs TCEHY Comparison Chart in %
NAPRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TCEHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAPRF vs. TCEHY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAPRF is a StrongBuy and TCEHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NAPRF: $70.15 vs. TCEHY: $83.34)
Brand notoriety: NAPRF and TCEHY are both not notable
NAPRF represents the Internet Retail, while TCEHY is part of the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAPRF: 2% vs. TCEHY: 227%
Market capitalization -- NAPRF: $58.03B vs. TCEHY: $764.72B
NAPRF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $58.03B. TCEHY’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $764.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.54T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $3.36T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $55.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $85.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAPRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCEHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NAPRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TCEHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NAPRF and TCEHY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAPRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCEHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAPRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCEHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NAPRF and TCEHY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NAPRF (@Internet Retail) experienced а -4.27% price change this week, while TCEHY (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +172.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

TCEHY is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+0.13% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

@Internet Software/Services (-3.10% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCEHY($765B) has a higher market cap than NAPRF($58B). TCEHY has higher P/E ratio than NAPRF: TCEHY (26.66) vs NAPRF (11.66). NAPRF (62.693) and TCEHY (60.785) have similar YTD gains . TCEHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 270B vs. NAPRF (13.3B). TCEHY has more cash in the bank: 380B vs. NAPRF (1.26B). NAPRF has less debt than TCEHY: NAPRF (16.8B) vs TCEHY (412B). TCEHY has higher revenues than NAPRF: TCEHY (704B) vs NAPRF (7.18B).
NAPRFTCEHYNAPRF / TCEHY
Capitalization58B765B8%
EBITDA13.3B270B5%
Gain YTD62.69360.785103%
P/E Ratio11.6626.6644%
Revenue7.18B704B1%
Total Cash1.26B380B0%
Total Debt16.8B412B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAPRF vs TCEHY: Fundamental Ratings
NAPRF
TCEHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
478
SMR RATING
1..100
1642
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6926
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCEHY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as NAPRF (45). This means that TCEHY’s stock grew similarly to NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCEHY (78). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCEHY’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as TCEHY (42). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to TCEHY’s over the last 12 months.

TCEHY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as NAPRF (46). This means that TCEHY’s stock grew similarly to NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TCEHY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAPRF (69). This means that TCEHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAPRFTCEHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAPRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TCEHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVT111.461.87
+1.71%
nVent Electric plc
INAB1.700.02
+1.19%
IN8bio Inc
SRDX41.350.41
+1.00%
Surmodics
SFBC44.81-0.47
-1.04%
Sound Financial Bancorp
BANC17.31-0.20
-1.14%
Banc of California

NAPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAPRF and TCTZF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAPRF and TCTZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAPRF
1D Price
Change %
NAPRF100%
N/A
TCTZF - NAPRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
TCEHY - NAPRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
RCRUY - NAPRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
ONFO - NAPRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROSY - NAPRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More

TCEHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCEHY has been closely correlated with PROSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCEHY jumps, then PROSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCEHY
1D Price
Change %
TCEHY100%
+0.27%
PROSY - TCEHY
83%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
TCTZF - TCEHY
81%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
NPSNY - TCEHY
80%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
BIDU - TCEHY
68%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
WB - TCEHY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More