Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NANC vs RECS
NANC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NANC vs RECS
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
Price$42.21
Change+$0.34 (+0.81%)
Volume$26.65K
Net Assets227.15M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.37
Change+$0.28 (+0.75%)
Volume$347.58K
Net Assets3.1B
NANC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NANC vs. RECS commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NANC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.1B vs. NANC (227M). NANC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NANC (9.409) vs RECS (7.943). NANC was incepted earlier than RECS: NANC (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NANC (0.74). RECS has a higher turnover NANC (44.00) vs NANC (44.00).
| NANC | RECS | NANC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 9.409 | 7.943 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 227M | 3.1B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.15 | 493% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 49.00 | 90% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 0.65 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NANC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NANC has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NANC jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| AMZN - NANC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| MSFT - NANC | 67% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| CRM - NANC | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| NVDA - NANC | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| AAPL - NANC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||