NAMS vs SANA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAMS is a Hold and SANA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NAMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SANA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NAMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SANA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NAMS (@Biotechnology) experienced а +10.29% price change this week, while SANA (@Biotechnology) price change was -16.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
NAMS is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
SANA is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-2.07% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| NAMS | SANA | NAMS / SANA | |
| Capitalization | 2.31B | 578M | 399% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 120.233 | -34.804 | -345% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| NAMS | SANA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 89% |
NAMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NAMS and GYRE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAMS and GYRE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NAMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAMS | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| GYRE - NAMS | 31% Poorly correlated | -9.56% | ||
| SPHDF - NAMS | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SANA - NAMS | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.34% | ||
| SLN - NAMS | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.98% | ||
| SLNCF - NAMS | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.39% | ||
More | ||||
SANA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANA has been loosely correlated with BEAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SANA jumps, then BEAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SANA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANA | 100% | -6.34% | ||
| BEAM - SANA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| CRSP - SANA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| RXRX - SANA | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
| FATE - SANA | 39% Loosely correlated | -8.82% | ||
| EDIT - SANA | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
More | ||||