NAKA
Price
$4.22
Change
-$0.41 (-8.86%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.6B
UHS
Price
$181.57
Change
+$0.06 (+0.03%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.55B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAKA vs UHS

Header iconNAKA vs UHS Comparison
Open Charts NAKA vs UHSBanner chart's image
Kindly MD
Price$4.22
Change-$0.41 (-8.86%)
Volume$2.85M
Capitalization1.6B
Universal Health Services
Price$181.57
Change+$0.06 (+0.03%)
Volume$520.81K
Capitalization11.55B
NAKA vs UHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAKA vs. UHS commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAKA is a Buy and UHS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NAKA: $4.22 vs. UHS: $181.57)
Brand notoriety: NAKA and UHS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAKA: 425% vs. UHS: 59%
Market capitalization -- NAKA: $1.6B vs. UHS: $11.55B
NAKA [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.6B. UHS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $11.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $95.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAKA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAKA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UHS is a better buy in the long-term than NAKA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAKA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAKA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • UHS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UHS is a better buy in the short-term than NAKA.

Price Growth

NAKA (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -33.23% price change this week, while UHS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

UHS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+0.43% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UHS($11.6B) has a higher market cap than NAKA($1.6B). NAKA YTD gains are higher at: 240.323 vs. UHS (1.532). NAKA has less debt than UHS: NAKA (559K) vs UHS (5.01B).
NAKAUHSNAKA / UHS
Capitalization1.6B11.6B14%
EBITDA-5.19MN/A-
Gain YTD240.3231.53215,684%
P/E RatioN/A9.57-
Revenue2.24MN/A-
Total Cash6.03MN/A-
Total Debt559K5.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UHS: Fundamental Ratings
UHS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAKAUHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BULZ193.264.74
+2.51%
MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs
LFAO146.860.83
+0.57%
LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF
JGH13.540.07
+0.52%
NUVEEN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
GLV5.780.02
+0.26%
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
HIYS25.660.06
+0.22%
Invesco High Yield Select ETF

NAKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAKA and FMS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAKA and FMS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAKA
1D Price
Change %
NAKA100%
-8.86%
FMS - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UHS - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
HCA - NAKA
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
THC - NAKA
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
AUNA - NAKA
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

UHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHS
1D Price
Change %
UHS100%
+0.03%
HCA - UHS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
THC - UHS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
ARDT - UHS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
ENSG - UHS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
CYH - UHS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
More