NAK
Price
$1.22
Change
-$0.01 (-0.81%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
169.37M
65 days until earnings call
OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.06 (-26.09%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
268.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAK vs OMHLF

Header iconNAK vs OMHLF Comparison
Open Charts NAK vs OMHLFBanner chart's image
Northern Dynasty Minerals
Price$1.22
Change-$0.01 (-0.81%)
Volume$4.6M
Capitalization169.37M
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.06 (-26.09%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization268.11M
NAK vs OMHLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAK vs. OMHLF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAK is a StrongBuy and OMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (NAK: $1.22 vs. OMHLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: NAK and OMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAK: 79% vs. OMHLF: 5%
Market capitalization -- NAK: $169.37M vs. OMHLF: $268.11M
NAK [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $169.37M. OMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $268.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the long-term than NAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NAK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NAK (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.43% price change this week, while OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAK is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMHLF($268M) has a higher market cap than NAK($169M). NAK YTD gains are higher at: 109.802 vs. OMHLF (-27.127). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 191M vs. NAK (-23.46M). OMHLF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. NAK (1.38M). NAK has less debt than OMHLF: NAK (515K) vs OMHLF (417M). OMHLF has higher revenues than NAK: OMHLF (883M) vs NAK (0).
NAKOMHLFNAK / OMHLF
Capitalization169M268M63%
EBITDA-23.46M191M-12%
Gain YTD109.802-27.127-405%
P/E RatioN/A4.42-
Revenue0883M-
Total Cash1.38M112M1%
Total Debt515K417M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAK: Fundamental Ratings
NAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRIGX18.30-0.23
-1.24%
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq Cl I
BMCRX25.41-0.33
-1.28%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr R
WSTYX65.41-1.17
-1.76%
Macquarie Science and Technology Y
WFSAX26.40-0.49
-1.82%
Allspring Small Company Growth A
JSIGX21.35-0.71
-3.22%
Jacob Small Cap Growth Institutional

NAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAK has been loosely correlated with TMQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAK jumps, then TMQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAK
1D Price
Change %
NAK100%
-0.81%
TMQ - NAK
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
CASXF - NAK
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HBM - NAK
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
VZLA - NAK
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
NXE - NAK
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
NAK - OMHLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
ALGEF - OMHLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADMLF - OMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More