NAK
Price
$1.14
Change
+$0.08 (+7.55%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
629.2M
51 days until earnings call
OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
135.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAK vs OMHLF

Header iconNAK vs OMHLF Comparison
Open Charts NAK vs OMHLFBanner chart's image
Northern Dynasty Minerals
Price$1.14
Change+$0.08 (+7.55%)
Volume$15M
Capitalization629.2M
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization135.22M
NAK vs OMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAK vs. OMHLF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAK is a Buy and OMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NAK: $1.14 vs. OMHLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: NAK and OMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAK: 240% vs. OMHLF: 144%
Market capitalization -- NAK: $629.2M vs. OMHLF: $135.22M
NAK [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $629.2M. OMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $135.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the long-term than NAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMHLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OMHLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than NAK.

Price Growth

NAK (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +30.84% price change this week, while OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAK is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAK($629M) has a higher market cap than OMHLF($135M). NAK YTD gains are higher at: 96.045 vs. OMHLF (-28.082). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17M vs. NAK (-78.34M). OMHLF has higher revenues than NAK: OMHLF (655M) vs NAK (0).
NAKOMHLFNAK / OMHLF
Capitalization629M135M466%
EBITDA-78.34M17M-461%
Gain YTD96.045-28.082-342%
P/E RatioN/A13.58-
Revenue0655M-
Total Cash25.2MN/A-
Total Debt3.42MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAK: Fundamental Ratings
NAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAKOMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCECX13.410.14
+1.05%
Steward Values Enhanced SmMidCapI
LSVFX11.640.10
+0.87%
LSV Global Managed Volatility Instl
JEPSX14.110.06
+0.43%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income R5
GLPRX33.750.12
+0.36%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras R
GLVIX93.150.26
+0.28%
Invesco Global Focus R6

NAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAK has been loosely correlated with CASXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAK jumps, then CASXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAK
1D Price
Change %
NAK100%
+7.55%
CASXF - NAK
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMQ - NAK
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
LGO - NAK
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
DFMTF - NAK
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.18%
ALM - NAK
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.96%
More

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+29.13%
NAK - OMHLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.55%
ADMLF - OMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXRVF - OMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More