Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAINX vs RLBEX
NAINX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts NAINX vs RLBEX
Virtus Tactical Allocation A
Price$11.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets627.1M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
NAINX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAINX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAINX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. NAINX (627M). RLBEX (1.74) and NAINX (1.69) have matching dividends . NAINX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: NAINX (85 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). NAINX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAINX (37.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAINX: RLBEX (250) vs NAINX (2500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. NAINX (-5.58). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.04 vs. NAINX (-6.22).
| NAINX | RLBEX | NAINX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.59 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.59 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 85 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.881 | 14.631 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.58 | 8.70 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.21 | 50.52 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.22 | 42.04 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.44 | 77.69 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement