Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAINX vs RLBCX
NAINX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts NAINX vs RLBCX
Virtus Tactical Allocation A
Price$11.23
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets639.49M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
NAINX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAINX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAINX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. NAINX (639M). NAINX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: NAINX (1.64) vs RLBCX (1.56). NAINX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: NAINX (85 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). NAINX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAINX (37.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAINX: RLBCX (250) vs NAINX (2500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. NAINX (-1.19). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.26 vs. NAINX (0.25).
| NAINX | RLBCX | NAINX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.89 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 85 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.245 | 9.537 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 639M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.56 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 7.61 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | 28.47 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.25 | 36.26 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.72 | 63.18 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement