Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. ZSCCX (29.3M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.28) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. ZSCCX (-9.24). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. ZSCCX (55.48).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.432 | 2.351 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 29.3M | 505,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | -9.24 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 10.66 | 355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.32 | 55.48 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.83 | 26.62 | 409% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement