Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$125.95
Change-$0.25 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZSCCX (30.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.21) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (15 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). ZSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. NAESX (7.55). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.08 vs. ZSCCX (30.90).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.616 | 12.835 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 30.8M | 529,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | 10.88 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 14.98 | 301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.08 | 30.90 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.47 | 48.15 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers