Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. ZSCCX (28.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.25) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. ZSCCX (-11.69). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.53 vs. ZSCCX (41.47).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.494 | 3.331 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 28.8M | 534,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | -11.69 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.39 | -1.72 | -1,187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.53 | 41.47 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.59 | 30.50 | 369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement