Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. ZSCCX (29.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.20) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. ZSCCX (-11.61). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. ZSCCX (59.46).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | 7.871 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 29.8M | 540,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | -11.61 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | 22.16 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.48 | 59.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.14 | 47.74 | 310% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement