Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$18.51
Change-$0.39 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.16M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WWSCX (70.2M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.22) vs WWSCX (0.05). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. WWSCX (-14.59). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. WWSCX (32.34).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.726 | 11.636 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 70.2M | 230,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.05 | 2,562% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | -14.59 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | 3.46 | 957% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.22 | 32.34 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.58 | 10.65 | 1,292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement