Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$18.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WWSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WWSCX (70.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.20) vs WWSCX (0.05). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. WWSCX (-8.80). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.06 vs. WWSCX (45.43).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.625 | 6.497 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 70.6M | 228,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.05 | 2,439% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | -8.80 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 6.67 | 485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.06 | 45.43 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.63 | 5.18 | 2,577% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement