Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$16.79
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.69M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WWSCX (66.7M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.28) vs WWSCX (0.05). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. WWSCX (-17.82). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. WWSCX (37.64).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.781 | -0.827 | -336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 66.7M | 229,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.05 | 2,407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -17.82 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.15 | -3.45 | -989% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.66 | 37.64 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | -3.84 | -2,989% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement