Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$17.13
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.41M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. WWSCX (67.4M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.25) vs WWSCX (0.05). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. WWSCX (-14.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.53 vs. WWSCX (31.92).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.494 | 1.181 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 67.4M | 228,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.05 | 2,388% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | -14.18 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.39 | -8.33 | -245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.53 | 31.92 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.59 | -3.81 | -2,953% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement