Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.64
Change+$0.15 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.11M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WMMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. WMMCX (207M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.28) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. WMMCX (-9.33). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. WMMCX (-26.90).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.432 | 6.577 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 207M | 71,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | -9.33 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | -24.38 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.32 | -26.90 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.83 | -40.74 | -267% |