Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$13.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.79M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WMMCX (204M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.20) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX (15.53) and WMMCX (14.83) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.06 vs. WMMCX (-29.86).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.625 | 9.696 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 204M | 78,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 14.83 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | -25.96 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.06 | -29.86 | -228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.63 | -34.21 | -391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement