Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.59
Change+$0.08 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.11M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WMMCX (203M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.28) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. WMMCX (-17.98). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. WMMCX (-28.31).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.781 | 6.155 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 203M | 75,369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -17.98 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.15 | -27.32 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.66 | -28.31 | -235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | -39.41 | -291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement