Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$10.23
Change-$0.15 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.65M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WMMCX (187M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.22) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. WMMCX (-16.89). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. WMMCX (-49.20).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.726 | -12.479 | -54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 187M | 86,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | -16.89 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | -41.95 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.22 | -49.20 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.58 | -48.26 | -285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement