Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.92
Change-$0.09 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.94M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WMMAX (192M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.23) vs WMMAX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. WMMAX (3.71). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 55.28 vs. WMMAX (-29.21).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.577 | 6.917 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 192M | 84,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 3.71 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.91 | -21.44 | -195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.28 | -29.21 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | -28.27 | -460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement