Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.83
Change-$0.16 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.83M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. WMMAX (199M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.25) vs WMMAX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). WMMAX (9.32) and NAESX (9.15) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.53 vs. WMMAX (-29.18).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.494 | 6.313 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 199M | 77,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 9.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.39 | -32.53 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.53 | -29.18 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.59 | -30.01 | -375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers