Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$12.85
Change-$0.18 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.65M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WMMAX (187M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.22) vs WMMAX (0.49). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. WMMAX (-16.45). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. WMMAX (-44.65).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.726 | -12.074 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 187M | 86,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.49 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | -16.45 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | -40.80 | -81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.22 | -44.65 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.58 | -40.50 | -340% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement