Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$21.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WHGSX (1.03B). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.20) vs WHGSX (0.79). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGSX (18 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. WHGSX (2.22). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.06 vs. WHGSX (51.88).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.625 | 4.988 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.03B | 15,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.79 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 2.22 | 700% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 17.95 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.06 | 51.88 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.63 | 72.59 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement