Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$126.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$19.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.32M
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WHGSX (942M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.21) vs WHGSX (0.82). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. WHGSX (-3.64). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. WHGSX (16.45).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.833 | -3.062 | -321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 942M | 17,304% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.82 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | -3.64 | -226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.83 | 9.50 | 472% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 16.45 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.16 | 59.72 | 240% |