Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$16.61
Change+$0.08 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.65M
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WHGMX (97.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.28) vs WHGMX (1.19). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGMX (20 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGMX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. WHGMX (5.79). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. WHGMX (52.26).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.781 | 4.861 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 97.6M | 156,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.19 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 5.79 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.15 | 36.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.66 | 52.26 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | 7.08 | 1,621% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement