Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$15.62
Change-$0.22 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.05M
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. WHGMX (92M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.35) vs WHGMX (1.25). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGMX (20 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGMX (100000). WHGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. NAESX (5.19). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. WHGMX (47.18).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.390 | -1.389 | 316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 92M | 160,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 5.60 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.28 | 31.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.19 | 47.18 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.88 | -4.41 | -2,107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement