Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$125.95
Change-$0.25 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$16.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.4M
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WHGMX (100M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.21) vs WHGMX (1.12). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGMX (20 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGMX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. WHGMX (4.39). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.08 vs. WHGMX (26.75).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.616 | 5.556 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 100M | 163,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.12 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | 4.39 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 34.32 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.08 | 26.75 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.47 | 21.65 | 653% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers