Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs SCUVX
NAESX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs SCUVX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.04
Change+$1.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$30.63
Change+$0.31 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.14M
NAESX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. SCUVX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. SCUVX (182M). NAESX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: NAESX (1.21) vs SCUVX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: NAESX (65 years) vs SCUVX (20 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). SCUVX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: SCUVX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. SCUVX (-7.64). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. SCUVX (13.75).
| NAESX | SCUVX | NAESX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.35 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.40 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.092 | 4.943 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 182M | 89,011% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | -7.64 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.07 | 13.75 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | 13.75 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.34 | 23.19 | 566% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement