Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs SCUVX
NAESX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs SCUVX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$130.40
Change+$7.85 (+6.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$28.26
Change-$0.60 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.83M
NAESX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. SCUVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. SCUVX (179M). NAESX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: NAESX (1.16) vs SCUVX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: NAESX (65 years) vs SCUVX (20 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). SCUVX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: SCUVX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.68 vs. SCUVX (-4.59). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 31.77 vs. SCUVX (-6.98).
| NAESX | SCUVX | NAESX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.35 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.40 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.519 | 6.441 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 179M | 90,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | -4.59 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.00 | -0.25 | -13,355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.77 | -6.98 | -455% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.98 | 42.07 | 442% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers