Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs SCUIX
NAESX vs SCUIX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs SCUIX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$126.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
Price$29.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.99M
NAESX vs SCUIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. SCUIX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and SCUIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. SCUIX (176M). NAESX pays higher dividends than SCUIX: NAESX (1.21) vs SCUIX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than SCUIX: NAESX (65 years) vs SCUIX (32 years). SCUIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). SCUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). SCUIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: SCUIX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. SCUIX (-5.88). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. SCUIX (-0.19).
| NAESX | SCUIX | NAESX / SCUIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.10 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.10 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.833 | -5.006 | -196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 176M | 92,614% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | -5.88 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.83 | 9.92 | 452% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | -0.19 | -19,264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.16 | 29.34 | 488% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers