Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs SCUIX
NAESX vs SCUIX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs SCUIX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.04
Change+$1.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
Price$32.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.81M
NAESX vs SCUIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. SCUIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and SCUIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. SCUIX (181M). NAESX pays higher dividends than SCUIX: NAESX (1.21) vs SCUIX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than SCUIX: NAESX (65 years) vs SCUIX (32 years). SCUIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). SCUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). SCUIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: SCUIX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. SCUIX (-6.98). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. SCUIX (16.51).
| NAESX | SCUIX | NAESX / SCUIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.10 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.10 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.092 | 5.167 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 181M | 89,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | -6.98 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.07 | 15.20 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | 16.51 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.34 | 29.96 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement