Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. RMCFX (305M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.20) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (65 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: RMCFX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. RMCFX (6.09). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.60 vs. RMCFX (16.68).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.54 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.494 | 8.449 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 305M | 52,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 6.09 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.23 | 19.55 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.60 | 16.68 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.36 | -6.99 | -1,894% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement