Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RBRCX
NAESX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RBRCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NAESX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RBRCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RBRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. RBRCX (32M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RBRCX: NAESX (1.20) vs RBRCX (0.80). NAESX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: NAESX (65 years) vs RBRCX (9 years). RBRCX (3.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RBRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBRCX: NAESX (3000) vs RBRCX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. RBRCX (-14.43). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. RBRCX (-49.18).
| NAESX | RBRCX | NAESX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.83 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 3.07 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | -0.724 | -857% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 32M | 503,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.80 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | -14.43 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | -11.54 | -439% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.48 | -49.18 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement