Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RBRCX
NAESX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RBRCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
NAESX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RBRCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and RBRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. RBRCX (34.1M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RBRCX: NAESX (1.28) vs RBRCX (0.85). NAESX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: NAESX (65 years) vs RBRCX (9 years). RBRCX (38.30) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RBRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBRCX: NAESX (3000) vs RBRCX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. RBRCX (-13.77). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. RBRCX (-51.56).
| NAESX | RBRCX | NAESX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.83 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 38.30 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.432 | -4.486 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 34.1M | 434,018% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.85 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | -13.77 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | -20.04 | -189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.32 | -51.56 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement