Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RBRCX
NAESX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RBRCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
NAESX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RBRCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and RBRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. RBRCX (33.7M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RBRCX: NAESX (1.28) vs RBRCX (0.85). NAESX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: NAESX (65 years) vs RBRCX (9 years). RBRCX (38.30) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RBRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBRCX: NAESX (3000) vs RBRCX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. RBRCX (-20.69). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. RBRCX (-53.46).
| NAESX | RBRCX | NAESX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.83 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 38.30 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.781 | -4.920 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 33.7M | 454,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.85 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -20.69 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.15 | -24.30 | -141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.66 | -53.46 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement