Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.58
Change-$0.21 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. QLSCX (1.5B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.23) vs QLSCX (0.32). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. NAESX (4.92). QLSCX (56.87) and NAESX (55.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.89 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.577 | 10.291 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 1.5B | 10,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.32 | 383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 9.06 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.91 | 51.22 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.28 | 56.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement