Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QISCX
NAESX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QISCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$29.80
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
NAESX vs QISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QISCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QISCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QISCX (1.5B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QISCX: NAESX (1.20) vs QISCX (0.32). NAESX was incepted earlier than QISCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than QISCX: NAESX (3000) vs QISCX (1000000). QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.96 vs. NAESX (13.62). QISCX (66.84) and NAESX (66.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NAESX | QISCX | NAESX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.89 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.98 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.494 | 11.153 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.5B | 10,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.32 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 17.96 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.23 | 47.02 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.60 | 66.84 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.36 | 96.87 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement