Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QISCX
NAESX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QISCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$30.06
Change+$0.27 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
NAESX vs QISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QISCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QISCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QISCX (1.52B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QISCX: NAESX (1.20) vs QISCX (0.32). NAESX was incepted earlier than QISCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than QISCX: NAESX (3000) vs QISCX (1000000). QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.00 vs. NAESX (8.00). QISCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.15 vs. NAESX (71.48).
| NAESX | QISCX | NAESX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.89 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.98 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | 12.122 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.52B | 10,627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.32 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 14.00 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | 62.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.48 | 76.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.14 | 113.51 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement