Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QCSCX
NAESX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QCSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$23.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
NAESX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QCSCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QCSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QCSCX (1.51B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: NAESX (1.20) vs QCSCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QCSCX (1500) vs NAESX (3000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.67 vs. NAESX (15.53). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.06 vs. QCSCX (51.83).
| NAESX | QCSCX | NAESX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.99 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.99 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.625 | 10.333 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.51B | 10,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.53 | 16.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 41.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.06 | 51.83 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.63 | 66.33 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement