Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSCX
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$21.73
Change+$0.12 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. NMSCX (2.6B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than NAESX: NMSCX (1.48) vs NAESX (1.28). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSCX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. NMSCX (-12.68). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. NMSCX (17.28).
| NAESX | NMSCX | NAESX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.781 | -5.316 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 2.6B | 5,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.48 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -12.68 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.15 | -6.98 | -489% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.66 | 17.28 | 386% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | 4.16 | 2,760% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement