Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$125.81
Change-$1.72 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.88
Change-$0.25 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. NMSAX (2.6B). NAESX (1.21) and NMSAX (1.17) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. NMSAX (-8.93). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.60 vs. NMSAX (-5.16).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.991 | -2.382 | -461% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 2.6B | 6,279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | -8.93 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.52 | -0.85 | -4,876% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.60 | -5.16 | -826% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.64 | 19.34 | 789% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers