Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. NMSAX (2.64B). NMSAX (1.20) and NAESX (1.20) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. NMSAX (-8.94). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. NMSAX (23.82).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | -0.529 | -1,171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 2.64B | 6,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | -8.94 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | 7.70 | 658% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.48 | 23.82 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.14 | 17.06 | 869% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement