Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.42
Change+$0.12 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. NMSAX (2.6B). NMSAX (1.28) and NAESX (1.28) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. NMSAX (-13.08). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. NMSAX (15.50).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.781 | -5.514 | -50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 2.6B | 5,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.28 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -13.08 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.15 | -7.96 | -429% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.66 | 15.50 | 430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | 1.68 | 6,817% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement