Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.10
Change-$1.26 (-5.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NMSAX (2.4B). NAESX (1.35) and NMSAX (1.29) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. NMSAX (-14.74). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. NMSAX (12.13).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.390 | -11.337 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 2.4B | 6,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | -14.74 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.28 | -12.36 | -253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.19 | 12.13 | 521% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.88 | -10.17 | -913% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers