Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs SCWFX
NAEFX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs SCWFX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$74.63
Change-$0.56 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.56M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$72.12
Change-$0.45 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
NAEFX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Buy and SCWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. NAEFX (277M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: NAEFX (1.47) vs SCWFX (0.55). NAEFX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: NAEFX (11 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). NAEFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: SCWFX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.08 vs. SCWFX (9.77). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.27 vs. NAEFX (13.97).
| NAEFX | SCWFX | NAEFX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.08 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.08 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.446 | 9.513 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.55 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.08 | 9.77 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.41 | 32.55 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.97 | 19.27 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.24 | 48.95 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement