Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLFX
NAEFX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLFX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$76.43
Change-$0.17 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets273.99M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$80.54
Change+$0.57 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
NAEFX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Buy and RSLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. NAEFX (274M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: NAEFX (1.37) vs RSLFX (0.81). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: NAEFX (11 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). NAEFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLFX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.94 vs. RSLFX (6.94). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.37 vs. NAEFX (-6.70).
| NAEFX | RSLFX | NAEFX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.772 | 13.316 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.81 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.94 | 6.94 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.13 | 31.29 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.70 | 4.37 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.17 | 69.35 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers