Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLCX
NAEFX vs RSLCX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLCX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$72.32
Change+$0.37 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.59M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
Price$70.04
Change+$0.50 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
NAEFX vs RSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Buy and RSLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLCX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. NAEFX (267M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: NAEFX (1.45) vs RSLCX (0.39). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: NAEFX (11 years) vs RSLCX (23 years). RSLCX (1.30) and NAEFX (1.28) have similar cost to investors . RSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLCX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). RSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.02 vs. NAEFX (9.88). RSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.52 vs. NAEFX (6.78).
| NAEFX | RSLCX | NAEFX / RSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.30 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.30 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.573 | 11.480 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.39 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 12.02 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.25 | 35.73 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.78 | 15.52 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.23 | 55.17 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers