Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLAX
NAEFX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLAX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$77.12
Change-$1.30 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.29M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$62.58
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
NAEFX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. NAEFX (284M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: NAEFX (1.42) vs RSLAX (0.10). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: NAEFX (11 years) vs RSLAX (23 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than NAEFX (1.28). RSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLAX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. RSLAX (5.63). RSLAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.78 vs. NAEFX (1.37).
| NAEFX | RSLAX | NAEFX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.791 | 10.182 | 293% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.10 | 1,356% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | 5.63 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 37.96 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.37 | 2.78 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.21 | 45.32 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers