Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NACP vs RECS
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empwrmt ETF
Price$51.59
Change+$3.48 (+7.23%)
Volume$1.64K
Net Assets65.04M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.05
Change+$0.69 (+1.71%)
Volume$712.13K
Net Assets5.1B
NACP vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NACP vs. RECS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NACP is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.1B vs. NACP (65M). NACP has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NACP (4.712) vs RECS (0.514). NACP was incepted earlier than RECS: NACP (8 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NACP (0.49). RECS has a higher turnover NACP (24.00) vs NACP (24.00).
| NACP | RECS | NACP / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.712 | 0.514 | 916% |
| Net Assets | 65M | 5.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 49.00 | 49% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 0.78 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NACP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
NACP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NACP has been loosely correlated with HWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NACP jumps, then HWM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NACP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACP | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| HWM - NACP | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| GEV - NACP | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| FERG - NACP | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| TW - NACP | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
| WY - NACP | 19% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.92% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||