| NACP | RECS | NACP / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 24.102 | 19.324 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 63M | 4.78B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 49.00 | 49% |
| Yield | 2.38 | 0.92 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| NACP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPF | 79.80 | 0.25 | +0.31% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF | |||
| BUFD | 28.38 | 0.07 | +0.25% |
| FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | |||
| XYLG | 29.78 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Global X S&P 500® Covered Call & Gr ETF | |||
| FTIF | 22.55 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Bloomberg Infl Snstv Eq ETF | |||
| BPI | 30.34 | -0.13 | -0.42% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NACP has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NACP jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NACP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACP | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| TFC - NACP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| HWM - NACP | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| J - NACP | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BKR - NACP | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| TT - NACP | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||