Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCPX vs PACAX
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.74
Change-$0.02 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.98
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets571.75M
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCPX vs. PACAX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. PACAX (572M). MXCPX (3.01) and PACAX (2.98) have matching dividends . MXCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXCPX (26 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.85). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MXCPX (26.00). MXCPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.95 vs. MXCPX (4.66). MXCPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.83 vs. PACAX (9.44).
| MXCPX | PACAX | MXCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.00 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.582 | 4.681 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 572M | 250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.98 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 4.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.90 | 18.77 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.83 | 9.44 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.05 | 21.94 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement