Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCCX vs VITSX
MXCCX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts MXCCX vs VITSX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index C
Price$8.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.92M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$163.84
Change+$0.68 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
MXCCX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCCX vs. VITSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCCX is a StrongBuy and VITSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. MXCCX (262M). VITSX pays higher dividends than MXCCX: VITSX (1.11) vs MXCCX (0.09). MXCCX was incepted earlier than VITSX: MXCCX (28 years) vs VITSX (28 years). MXCCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). MXCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). MXCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: MXCCX (1500) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.44 vs. MXCCX (0.60). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 77.22 vs. MXCCX (-20.12).
| MXCCX | VITSX | MXCCX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.03 | 4,833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.03 | 5,233% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.382 | 15.512 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.11 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 11.44 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.90 | 64.45 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.12 | 77.22 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.24 | 223.65 | -18% |