Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCCX vs VITSX
MXCCX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts MXCCX vs VITSX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index C
Price$7.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.4M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$155.58
Change-$0.30 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
MXCCX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCCX vs. VITSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCCX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. MXCCX (251M). VITSX pays higher dividends than MXCCX: VITSX (1.17) vs MXCCX (0.09). MXCCX was incepted earlier than VITSX: MXCCX (28 years) vs VITSX (28 years). MXCCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). MXCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). MXCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: MXCCX (1500) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. MXCCX (4.71). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 84.98 vs. MXCCX (-19.13).
| MXCCX | VITSX | MXCCX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.03 | 4,833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.03 | 5,233% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.114 | 10.352 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.17 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | 18.04 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.59 | 63.66 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.13 | 84.98 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.61 | 224.85 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement