Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWOFX vs RPEBX
MWOFX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts MWOFX vs RPEBX
MFS Global Growth A
Price$61.29
Change-$4.37 (-6.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets921.86M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.57
Change-$2.35 (-3.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
MWOFX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWOFX vs. RPEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWOFX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MWOFX (922M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: RPEBX (0.55) vs MWOFX (0.11). MWOFX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: MWOFX (32 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.20). RPEBX (23.00) and MWOFX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: RPEBX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). RPEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. MWOFX (-2.40). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.99 vs. MWOFX (5.00).
| MWOFX | RPEBX | MWOFX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.20 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.20 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.046 | 1.562 | -131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 922M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.55 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.40 | 12.26 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.11 | 39.04 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.00 | 13.99 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.92 | 120.28 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement