MWG
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.89M
PRLPF
Price
$23.20
Change
-$0.24 (-1.02%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
908.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MWG vs PRLPF

Header iconMWG vs PRLPF Comparison
Open Charts MWG vs PRLPFBanner chart's image
Multi Ways Holdings
Price$0.33
Change-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Volume$731.28K
Capitalization10.89M
PROPEL
Price$23.20
Change-$0.24 (-1.02%)
Volume$480
Capitalization908.25M
MWG vs PRLPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MWG vs. PRLPF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWG is a StrongBuy and PRLPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MWG: $0.33 vs. PRLPF: $23.20)
Brand notoriety: MWG and PRLPF are both not notable
MWG represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while PRLPF is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MWG: 109% vs. PRLPF: 7%
Market capitalization -- MWG: $10.89M vs. PRLPF: $908.25M
MWG [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $10.89M. PRLPF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $908.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $62.75B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $666.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MWG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MWG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MWG and PRLPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MWG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRLPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MWG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRLPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the short-term than MWG.

Price Growth

MWG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +37.89% price change this week, while PRLPF (@Savings Banks) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.10%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.01% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Savings Banks (+0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRLPF($908M) has a higher market cap than MWG($10.9M). PRLPF has higher P/E ratio than MWG: PRLPF (15.68) vs MWG (1.28). MWG YTD gains are higher at: 15.152 vs. PRLPF (-4.329).
MWGPRLPFMWG / PRLPF
Capitalization10.9M908M1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.152-4.329-350%
P/E Ratio1.2815.688%
RevenueN/A494M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A290M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MWGPRLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFSVX14.830.13
+0.88%
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
ARYYX13.720.11
+0.81%
American Century Global Real Estate Y
ERSMX31.970.08
+0.25%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
FSCCX34.14-0.01
-0.03%
Nuveen Small Cap Value I
ACAZX45.11-0.11
-0.24%
Alger Capital Appreciation Z

MWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MWG and DXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MWG and DXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWG
1D Price
Change %
MWG100%
-5.39%
DXF - MWG
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
WSC - MWG
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
CACC - MWG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
AIHS - MWG
20%
Poorly correlated
-24.44%
SNTG - MWG
18%
Poorly correlated
-11.40%
More

PRLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRLPF and AIJTY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRLPF and AIJTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLPF
1D Price
Change %
PRLPF100%
-1.02%
AIJTY - PRLPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+9.25%
VSTS - PRLPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
MWG - PRLPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.39%
SEZL - PRLPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
AIFLF - PRLPF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More