It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MVIS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOTK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MVIS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOTK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MVIS (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +2.03% price change this week, while SOTK (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.32%.
MVIS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
SOTK is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| MVIS | SOTK | MVIS / SOTK | |
| Capitalization | 218M | 65.8M | 331% |
| EBITDA | -60.26M | 2.19M | -2,749% |
| Gain YTD | -13.742 | 0.484 | -2,838% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 41.90 | - |
| Revenue | 2.64M | 20.4M | 13% |
| Total Cash | 99.5M | 11.7M | 850% |
| Total Debt | 46.6M | N/A | - |
MVIS | SOTK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MVIS's Valuation (47) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SOTK (68) in the null industry. This means that MVIS’s stock grew similarly to SOTK’s over the last 12 months.
MVIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SOTK (100) in the null industry. This means that MVIS’s stock grew similarly to SOTK’s over the last 12 months.
SOTK's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MVIS (99) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SOTK’s stock grew similarly to MVIS’s over the last 12 months.
SOTK's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MVIS (87) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SOTK’s stock grew somewhat faster than MVIS’s over the last 12 months.
SOTK's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MVIS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SOTK’s stock grew similarly to MVIS’s over the last 12 months.
| MVIS | SOTK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 17 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVIS has been loosely correlated with FCUV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MVIS jumps, then FCUV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MVIS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVIS | 100% | -3.80% | ||
| FCUV - MVIS | 57% Loosely correlated | -12.54% | ||
| ARBE - MVIS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| TRMB - MVIS | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.44% | ||
| ITRI - MVIS | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.46% | ||
| GRMN - MVIS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOTK and FCUV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOTK and FCUV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOTK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOTK | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| FCUV - SOTK | 27% Poorly correlated | -12.54% | ||
| MLAB - SOTK | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| KYCCF - SOTK | 12% Poorly correlated | +5.14% | ||
| KEYS - SOTK | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| MVIS - SOTK | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.80% | ||
More | ||||