Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NMVZX
MVCAX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NMVZX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$12.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.28M
MVCAX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NMVZX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NMVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. NMVZX (414M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: NMVZX (2.64) vs MVCAX (0.83). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NMVZX (9 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NMVZX (0.86). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVZX: MVCAX (1000) vs NMVZX (2500). NMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.45 vs. MVCAX (-9.54). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.80 vs. NMVZX (-3.14).
| MVCAX | NMVZX | MVCAX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.81 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.86 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | 3.911 | 153% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 414M | 4,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 2.64 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.54 | -5.45 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.01 | -0.27 | -4,131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.80 | -3.14 | -1,044% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers