Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBRAX
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBRAX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$28.07
Change-$0.46 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.97M
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBRAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. NBRAX (51M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: MVCAX (0.85) vs NBRAX (0.35). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and NBRAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.75 vs. MVCAX (-9.14). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.66 vs. MVCAX (38.31).
| MVCAX | NBRAX | MVCAX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.78 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.117 | 8.520 | 60% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 51M | 32,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.35 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.14 | -0.75 | 1,219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | 16.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.31 | 61.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.71 | 38.07 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement