Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBRAX
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBRAX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.88M
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBRAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. NBRAX (50.9M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: MVCAX (0.84) vs NBRAX (0.35). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and NBRAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.42 vs. MVCAX (-9.14). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.55 vs. MVCAX (44.40).
| MVCAX | NBRAX | MVCAX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.78 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.585 | 6.314 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 50.9M | 33,202% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.35 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.14 | -0.42 | 2,176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.07 | 24.38 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.40 | 73.55 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.98 | 30.18 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement