Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBMRX
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBMRX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$26.40
Change-$0.11 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.85M
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBMRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. NBMRX (50.8M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: MVCAX (0.86) vs NBMRX (0.80). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: NBMRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. MVCAX (-3.52). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 69.16 vs. MVCAX (47.65).
| MVCAX | NBMRX | MVCAX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.72 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.325 | 0.610 | 545% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 50.8M | 33,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.80 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.52 | 0.44 | -801% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | 5.53 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.65 | 69.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement