MUX
Price
$9.64
Change
-$0.54 (-5.30%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
32 days until earnings call
SA
Price
$17.22
Change
-$0.54 (-3.04%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MUX vs SA

Header iconMUX vs SA Comparison
Open Charts MUX vs SABanner chart's image
McEwen Mining
Price$9.64
Change-$0.54 (-5.30%)
Volume$958.37K
CapitalizationN/A
Seabridge Gold
Price$17.22
Change-$0.54 (-3.04%)
Volume$458K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MUX vs SA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MUX vs. SA commentary
Sep 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUX is a Hold and SA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2024
Stock price -- (MUX: $8.46 vs. SA: $16.47)
Brand notoriety: MUX and SA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUX: 104% vs. SA: 131%
Market capitalization -- MUX: $487.48M vs. SA: $1.31B
MUX [@Precious Metals] is valued at $487.48M. SA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $977.73M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MUX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SA is a better buy in the long-term than MUX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SA is a better buy in the short-term than MUX.

Price Growth

MUX (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.32% price change this week, while SA (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8976.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.

SA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SA($1.31B) has a higher market cap than MUX($487M). SA has higher P/E ratio than MUX: SA (158.73) vs MUX (9.14). SA YTD gains are higher at: 35.779 vs. MUX (17.337). SA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -33.83M vs. MUX (-73.95M). SA has more cash in the bank: 86.2M vs. MUX (24.8M). MUX has less debt than SA: MUX (41.5M) vs SA (575M). MUX has higher revenues than SA: MUX (166M) vs SA (0).
MUXSAMUX / SA
Capitalization487M1.31B37%
EBITDA-73.95M-33.83M219%
Gain YTD17.33735.77948%
P/E Ratio9.14158.736%
Revenue166M0-
Total Cash24.8M86.2M29%
Total Debt41.5M575M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUX vs SA: Fundamental Ratings
MUX
SA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
6192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUX's Valuation (88) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SA (95). This means that MUX’s stock grew similarly to SA’s over the last 12 months.

SA's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUX (100). This means that SA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUX’s over the last 12 months.

MUX's SMR Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SA (92). This means that MUX’s stock grew similarly to SA’s over the last 12 months.

SA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MUX (50). This means that SA’s stock grew similarly to MUX’s over the last 12 months.

SA's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUX (85). This means that SA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUXSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

MUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUX has been loosely correlated with RGLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUX jumps, then RGLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUX
1D Price
Change %
MUX100%
-7.03%
RGLD - MUX
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
SAND - MUX
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.27%
MAG - MUX
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.67%
SVM - MUX
58%
Loosely correlated
-7.65%
SA - MUX
58%
Loosely correlated
-6.26%
More

SA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SA has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SA jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SA
1D Price
Change %
SA100%
-6.26%
AEM - SA
71%
Closely correlated
-3.02%
HL - SA
68%
Closely correlated
-9.11%
SAND - SA
68%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
MAG - SA
67%
Closely correlated
-6.67%
KGC - SA
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.87%
More