MUSA
Price
$420.99
Change
-$0.55 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.88B
10 days until earnings call
SAH
Price
$76.94
Change
+$0.64 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MUSA vs SAH

Header iconMUSA vs SAH Comparison
Open Charts MUSA vs SAHBanner chart's image
Murphy USA
Price$420.99
Change-$0.55 (-0.13%)
Volume$194.18K
Capitalization8.88B
Sonic Automotive
Price$76.94
Change+$0.64 (+0.84%)
Volume$219.74K
Capitalization1.94B
MUSA vs SAH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUSA vs. SAH commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUSA is a Hold and SAH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (MUSA: $420.99 vs. SAH: $76.94)
Brand notoriety: MUSA and SAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUSA: 61% vs. SAH: 118%
Market capitalization -- MUSA: $8.88B vs. SAH: $1.94B
MUSA [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8.88B. SAH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUSA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MUSA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAH is a better buy in the long-term than MUSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUSA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUSA is a better buy in the short-term than SAH.

Price Growth

MUSA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while SAH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -12.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUSA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SAH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.18% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUSA($8.88B) has a higher market cap than SAH($1.94B). MUSA has higher P/E ratio than SAH: MUSA (16.75) vs SAH (11.30). SAH YTD gains are higher at: 22.728 vs. MUSA (-15.910). MUSA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. SAH (559M). MUSA has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. SAH (28.9M). MUSA has less debt than SAH: MUSA (2.27B) vs SAH (3.86B). MUSA has higher revenues than SAH: MUSA (21.5B) vs SAH (14.4B).
MUSASAHMUSA / SAH
Capitalization8.88B1.94B457%
EBITDA1.06B559M190%
Gain YTD-15.91022.728-70%
P/E Ratio16.7511.30148%
Revenue21.5B14.4B149%
Total Cash125M28.9M433%
Total Debt2.27B3.86B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUSA vs SAH: Fundamental Ratings
MUSA
SAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1582
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2114
SMR RATING
1..100
1740
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAH's Valuation (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUSA (80). This means that SAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (21). This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's SMR Rating (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SAH (40). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to SAH’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (63). This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (71). This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUSASAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCMIX161.220.47
+0.29%
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst2
NBREX26.340.02
+0.08%
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Tr
PLCIX64.63-0.02
-0.03%
Voya Large-Cap Growth I
FIJDX37.91-0.04
-0.11%
Fidelity Advisor Gold Z
NWAUX14.32-0.03
-0.21%
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A

MUSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUSA
1D Price
Change %
MUSA100%
-0.13%
CASY - MUSA
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
ORLY - MUSA
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
TSCO - MUSA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
ABG - MUSA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
SAH - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More

SAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAH has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAH jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAH
1D Price
Change %
SAH100%
+0.84%
PAG - SAH
81%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
AN - SAH
80%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
GPI - SAH
79%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
ABG - SAH
79%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
LAD - SAH
69%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
More